Oracle, Mozilla, W3C: Broken Links, Broken Web, Slugs in a Bucket

Type plate of a DEC PDP 12 minicomputer.  A large rotary switch is set to offline.

This post is about why today I had intense fantasies about having an offline switch at least as large as the one on this DEC PDP-12 photographed at Vienna Observatory in 2018.

I give you it has become somewhat trite to state the obvious: The Web (and quite possibly most of the Internet) is broken. Admittedly, a few relatively simple measures – a few well-placed dnsmasq statements, a default-no-javascript browser and a general avoidance of for-profit pages – can hide quite a bit of that brokenness. Today, however, it hit me hard; and two nonprofits were part of what makes me once more seriously consider a livelihood as a gardener.

A long history of evil getting worse

I must concede that it didn't take the pure evil of Oracle to fool around with redirects instead of 404s and to wantonly tear down static pages that could have been maintained forever at zero cost. Even the lesser evil that Sun was did that, as evinced by this 2006 capture from the Web Archive. That's already less than ten years after JDK 1.1 was released a quarter century ago (February 1997).

Which brings me to another reason to want to retire: This link has been broken for more than 15 years now. I suspect I'm imagining the W3C to be a lot better staffed than it actually is, and yes, touching normative content is a tricky thing to do. But either through an Erratum or as an editorial change the W3C could and should have fixed the clickjacked link some time within those 15 years. That would have been particularly thoughtful given that my reaction probably isn't too untypical: Rather than go to the Internet Archive to fetch the original documentation right away, I looked for DecimalFormat in today's Java documentation. And yay!, it says:

It also supports […] scientific notation […] Example: "0.###E0" formats the number 1234 as "1.234E3".

Except it didn't for me. The numbers were stubbornly unformatted regardless of what I did as soon as I tried any sort of scientific notation. Which drove me entirely crazy until I ran the browser from a terminal and saw log output there:

error
xsltFormatNumberConversion : error in format string '0.###E0', using default

It still took a while until I realised the problem was not actually with the format string – that I had taken literally from the modern documentation: Gnah! – but that JDK 1.1 just didn't have the feature. I actually had to go to an older capture of Sun's documentation to figure that out (do donate to the Internet Archive, please).

That was not the end of my webaches of the day.

Mozilla: Crashes in the supply chain

Proclamation: I'm a huge fan of the MDN whenever I do “web development“. You may hence get an idea of my desperation when, minutes after I had somewhat worked out the Sun-Oracle-W3C debacle, I was looking up the border-spacing CSS property at MDN and just saw a brief flash of content and then this:

Screenshot: an empty browser window

What deviltry…? From folks who are at least reasonably concerned about standards compliance and accessability? Well, a quick glance into the developer tools made my me shiver. Here's what I found in the error console:

[Error] The source list for Content Security Policy directive 'script-src' contains an invalid source: ''report-sample''. It will be ignored.
[and a lot more CSP stuff]
[Error] Failed to load resource: Unacceptable TLS certificate (analytics.js, line 0)
"Error executing Glean task: NotFoundError: Failed to execute 'transaction' on 'IDBDatabase': One of the specified object stores was not found."
[Error] (Glean.core.Dispatcher) – "Error initializing dispatcher, won't execute anything further." – "There might be more error logs above."
[Error] TypeError: null is not an object (evaluating 'localStorage.getItem')
[Error] TypeError: null is not an object (evaluating 'localStorage.getItem')

So… the Mozilla folks list all kinds of new-fangled (i.e., bullseye Webkit doesn't know about them) Content Security Policies. I'll allow they do that out of concern for my privacy – though frankly, I'm not much worried about cross-site scripting from MDN, in particular because the site generally works fine without Javascript (I don't remember when or why I switched it on for them). Be that as it may, after all the CSP-ing, they turn around and try to rat me out to Google analytics (which fails here because google-analytics.com resolves to 127.0.0.1 on my boxes). Hu?

Want to report a bug? Feed Microsoft!

Anyway, I had Javascript on, and then I got the blank page because rendering crashes when the thing cannot do Javascript local storage. If you wonder why I keep that off by default, check out my rant against it; sorry: in German). That's why I get a blank page. It all goes belly-up starting with a message “Unable to read theme from localStorage“ from witin some React code. Call me a purist, but I don't even see how you'd need the ghastly React Javascript “framework“ <cough> for a documentation site. Why this would need to store a theme at all and why this should be crashing the whole doument[2] when it can't do that is entirely beyond me.

Given that Mozilla are (to some extent) good guys, I wanted to file a bug. They also were home to the premier bugtracker of the 2000s, bugzilla, so… No. Even the contribution guide [warning: github link] – a static document! – sits in github, collecting behavioural surplus for Microsoft.

Ah… sorry, Mozilla, if React and github are your ideas of an open, accessible, and standards-compliant Web, there is no point filing bugs against MDN. That's not a good use of the surveillance capital I have to give.

But then: being a gardener isn't all that idyllic either:

Lots of slugs in a bucket

Given that, Oracle and Mozilla are not much worse. So, I guess I'll keep doing computers for a little while, at least as long as I can somehow still work around the postmodern Web's breakage most of the time.

[1]Well, actually I was looking at a local mirror of that, but if turns out that looking at the online material right away wouldn't have made a difference.
[2]I just notice that the existence of the phrase “crashing a document“ is a rather characteristic symptom of the state of the Web.
Kategorie: edv

Kriegsfieber aktuell

Bar-plot in
    		Tönen von Oliv
(Erklärung)